The best project management software for architects depends on what your practice needs to control: fees and phases, drawing review, or client sign-off. Scoro and Deltek suit firms that want project phases, time and accounting in one system, Paymo and Harvest suit smaller studios that need time tracking and invoicing, and Bluebeam suits teams that live in PDF drawings.
Enlisted's catalogue holds very few tools built only for architects, and this guide says so rather than stretching the list. The picks below either name architecture on the vendor's own pages or fill a clear job in an architecture practice, and each pick states how close the fit is. They are grouped by job: firm-wide fee and phase control, small-studio time and billing, drawing review, client approvals, and open source.
| Tool | Type | Category | Self-host | Pricing | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scoro | SaaS | Project Management | No | From €15/mo per seat | Closed source |
Deltek | SaaS | ERP | No | Contact sales | Closed source |
Paymo | SaaS | Project Management | No | Free plan · from $9.90/mo | Closed source |
Harvest | SaaS | Productivity | No | Free plan · from $11/mo per seat | Closed source |
Teamwork | SaaS | Project Management | No | Free plan · from $9.99/mo per seat | Closed source |
Bluebeam | SaaS | Productivity | No | From $260/yr per seat | Closed source |
Filestage | SaaS | Project Management | No | Free plan | Closed source |
TryApprove | SaaS | Project Management | No | Free plan · from $29/mo | Closed source |
OpenProject | Open source | Project Management | Yes | Free · cloud from €5.95/mo per seat | ★ 16k |
Live data from Enlisted: GitHub stats sync daily; pricing comes from each vendor's pricing page. “Vendor edition” means closed source, with a version the vendor lets you run on your own servers.
What architects need project management software to do
Architecture work is billed against phases and fees and delivered as drawings that clients and consultants must review. That gives project management for design studios three separate jobs:
- Control fees and hours. Time logged against a project should be comparable with the fee you quoted, and it should flow into invoices.
- Review drawings and documents. Markup, versions and RFIs or submittals during construction sit in a different tool from the task list.
- Get approvals from clients. Sign-off needs a record of who approved which version.
Few products do all three. Most firms end up with a core tool plus one or two specialists, so this guide asks which job each pick solves.
How we picked
A tool made this list when Enlisted's data or the vendor's own site ties it to architecture or to one of the jobs above. Scoro, Deltek, Paymo, Harvest and Bluebeam name architecture or AEC directly. Filestage, TryApprove and Teamwork are built for agencies and client services, so they fit architects loosely, and the text says where. Candidates that only matched on a keyword, such as a tool whose "architecture" is its software design, were dropped. Pricing is described in general terms because plans change. This is not first-hand testing: it draws on catalogue entries, vendor sites and pricing pages. See how Enlisted ranks tools.
Best for firms that run fees, phases and accounting together
When a practice has several project leads and a finance function, the question shifts from tasks to profitability per project.
1. Scoro: best for phase, resource and fee control in an architecture firm
Scoro is professional services automation software that combines project and task management, time and cost tracking, capacity planning, CRM, estimating, budgeting and client billing. Its site has a page for architecture firms and A&E practices, which describes managing project phases, resource allocation, time tracking and fee invoicing in one system, and tracking purchase orders for outside engineers and consultants. Enlisted lists architecture and engineering project accounting among its use cases.
Integrations include Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Expensify, Stripe, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange and Jira. Pricing is per user and depends on which app combination you choose, with a free trial.
- Best for: architecture and engineering firms that want quotes, phases, timesheets and invoices connected.
- Watch out for: the pricing page lists a minimum number of users, which matters for a small practice, and it is closed source and hosted only.
2. Deltek: best project accounting for architecture and engineering firms
Deltek is a project-based ERP vendor whose cloud line is split by industry. Vantagepoint serves architecture, engineering and consulting firms, and Ajera covers project and accounting software for small architecture and engineering firms. The vendor's pitch is governance and control across the project lifecycle, from winning work to delivery and analysis, and Enlisted lists architecture and engineering firms tracking projects among its use cases.
Deltek publishes no prices and sells through its sales team. It is a firm-wide finance and project system rather than a lightweight task board.
- Best for: established design firms that want project accounting, resource and time management in one ERP.
- Watch out for: a sales-led purchase and implementation effort that is heavier than a time tracker, and no self-hosted edition.
Other professional services platforms in the catalogue, including Productive, Accelo, Kantata and Runn, target agencies and consultancies and do not name architecture. They are worth a look only if you want resource planning beyond what a time tracker offers. Our guide to project management software for consultants and agencies compares that group.
Best for small studios and sole practitioners
A small studio mostly needs three things: log hours, plan deliverables, and send an invoice. The tools here do that without an ERP rollout.
3. Paymo: best all-in-one for small architecture studios
Paymo is hosted project management software that joins time tracking, task boards, Gantt charts, team scheduling, invoicing and file proofing. The vendor publishes an architecture page that pitches time tracking, project planning with Gantt charts and milestones, file proofing with versioning, and invoicing from timesheets. Enlisted notes that its industry pages cover architecture, and that it targets freelancers, small agencies and service teams.
It has a free plan for one user, a trial of paid plans, and paid plans priced per user.
- Best for: small practices that want planning, time and invoices in one hosted app.
- Watch out for: it is a general tool, so there are no drawing, BIM or CAD features, and per-user pricing grows with the team.
4. Harvest: best for time tracking and invoicing against project fees
Harvest is a hosted time tracking tool with expenses, reporting and invoicing for professional teams that bill clients by the hour. Its solutions pages list architecture among the industries it targets, and the architecture pages describe tracking time by project phase and reporting on profitability by project type. Harvest Forecast is a companion product for scheduling capacity, and integrations include Asana, Slack and Stripe.
Harvest does not manage tasks or drawings, so it pairs with a board or Gantt tool. It has a free plan limited to one seat and two projects, with paid plans per seat.
- Best for: studios that already have a task tool and want hours, expenses and invoices handled well.
- Watch out for: it is not a project manager, and the free plan is capped to one seat.
5. Teamwork: best for client projects with budgets and profitability
Teamwork is professional services automation software for client work, combining project management, intake forms, time tracking, budgets, profitability reports, resource planning and client feedback through proofs. It does not name architecture, so it fits design studios as a client-services tool, not as an architecture product. It has a free plan for small teams and paid plans per user.
- Best for: design practices that want client projects, budgets and utilization visible together.
- Watch out for: the vendor's examples are agencies and consultancies, so check that the proofing handles the files you share.
Best for drawing markup and design review
6. Bluebeam: best PDF drawing markup for design review
Bluebeam is a commercial software suite for architecture, engineering and construction teams, built around Bluebeam Revu for marking up, measuring and managing PDF drawings and documents. Listed workflows include drawing management, design review, takeoffs, RFIs, submittals, punch lists and construction closeout, with an integrations directory for other construction tools.
It is priced per user per year with a free trial. It reviews and measures documents rather than scheduling work or tracking time.
- Best for: architects who review and mark up PDF drawing sets with consultants and contractors.
- Watch out for: it does not manage fees, tasks or invoices, so pair it with a project and billing tool. See the best CAD software guide for the drawing tools themselves.
Best for client approvals and design sign-off
A client approving a design package is a different job from a team reviewing drawings. These two tools are built for agencies and freelancers, so they fit architecture only loosely.
7. Filestage: best for structured approval rounds on PDFs and designs
Filestage is online proofing software where teams upload files, collect annotated feedback and route content through a defined approval process. It handles documents and PDFs, designs and images, videos and live websites, and adds automations and review analytics. Enlisted lists client approvals for agencies among its use cases.
Plans come with a free trial and are listed on the vendor's pricing page.
- Best for: studios that run formal review rounds on presentations and PDF packages with several approvers.
- Watch out for: it is built for creative and marketing teams, and Enlisted's entry lists no drawing-specific tools such as scaled measurement.
8. TryApprove: best white-label client portal for small studios
TryApprove is a white-label client portal for agencies and freelancers. Clients reach it through a magic link with no account or password, and inside it they find onboarding documents, deliverables, approvals and invoices. Onboarding covers contracts with e-signature and intake questionnaires, and deliverables carry version history so clients can compare versions and pin comments.
It lets you start free with no credit card, and plans are on the pricing page.
- Best for: sole practitioners and small studios who want one branded place for contracts, deliverables, approvals and invoices.
- Watch out for: the product is aimed at agencies and freelancers, and its project features are tasks, not phased scheduling.
For design feedback pinned onto images or website screenshots, VYNL is a similar review tool for design teams.
Best open-source option
9. OpenProject: best self-hosted tool for phases, Gantt charts and time tracking
OpenProject is open-source project management software under the GPL-3.0 licence. It covers Gantt chart planning, agile boards, roadmaps, and time tracking with cost reporting and budgets, plus wikis and meeting agendas and minutes. The Community edition is free, and it can be self-hosted or used as a hosted service.
It is a general project tool, not an architecture product, and Enlisted's entry lists no invoicing or client portal, so you would pair it with accounting software. It is the strongest self-hosted route in the catalogue for a studio that wants to keep project data on its own server. Other free options are covered in the free project management software guide.
- Best for: studios that value data control and want Gantt planning and budgets without a per-user licence.
- Watch out for: you run the server and upgrades yourself unless you buy hosting, and billing and client sign-off need other tools.
What architects should check before buying
Two requirements decide most purchases in a design practice, and a third narrows the field.
- Can it compare hours to the fee? If you bill fixed fees by phase, look for time tracking that rolls up by project and phase and reports against a budget. Harvest and Scoro describe phase-aware tracking on their architecture pages, and OpenProject lists time tracking with cost reporting and budgets.
- How do drawings and approvals travel? Confirm the review tool handles the formats you send. Bluebeam is built around PDFs, and Filestage lists documents, PDFs, designs and images. Check whether clients need an account: TryApprove and VYNL both advertise review links without one.
- Does it connect to your accounting? Scoro lists Xero, QuickBooks and Sage Intacct, Teamwork lists accounting integrations, and Deltek carries project accounting itself. If you only need a general task board, our Asana alternatives guide covers the options, and the productivity category has related tools.
If your work leans toward site supervision, the project management software for construction guide covers jobsite tools such as Fieldwire, and the planned guide to time tracking software for architects and engineers goes deeper on billing. The wider project management category lists every tool in this guide.
Which project management software should an architecture practice choose?
| If you need | Start with |
|---|---|
| Phases, fees, resources and accounting in one firm-wide system | Scoro or Deltek |
| Planning, hours and invoices for a small studio | Paymo |
| Hours, expenses and invoices alongside a task tool you already use | Harvest |
| Client projects with budgets and utilization | Teamwork |
| PDF drawing markup and review | Bluebeam |
| Formal sign-off rounds with clients | Filestage or TryApprove |
| Self-hosted Gantt planning and time tracking | OpenProject |
Pricing compared
Plans and list prices from each vendor's pricing page. Prices change, so confirm the current price on the vendor's page before you buy.
| Tool | Free option | Paid plans | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
Scoro | Free trial |
| Pricing pageChecked 2 Oct 2026 |
Deltek | No free plan | Priced on request | Pricing page |
Paymo | Free planFree trial |
| Pricing pageChecked 2 Oct 2026 |
Harvest | Free planFree trial |
| Pricing pageChecked 2 Oct 2026 |
Teamwork | Free planFree trial |
OptimizePrices on the vendor's page | Pricing pageChecked 2 Oct 2026 |
Bluebeam | Free trial |
| Pricing pageChecked 3 Oct 2026 |
Filestage | Free plan | See the vendor's pricing page | Pricing page |
TryApprove | Free planFree trial |
| Pricing pageChecked 7 Oct 2026 |
OpenProject | Free (open source)Self-hostable |
CorporatePrices on the vendor's page | Pricing pageChecked 2 Oct 2026 |
List prices from each vendor's public pricing page on the date shown. Annual billing is often cheaper, and taxes, usage and transaction fees aren't included. Open-source tools cost nothing to self-host beyond your own server.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the best project management software for architects?
- There is no single winner, because architecture practices differ in size. Scoro and Deltek handle phases, fees and project billing for firms, Paymo and Harvest cover time tracking and invoicing for small studios, and Bluebeam handles PDF drawing markup and review. Pick the one that matches the problem you have today.
- What software do architecture firms use to track time and bill clients?
- Harvest, Paymo and Scoro all combine time tracking with invoicing, and their sites include pages written for architecture firms. Deltek's Vantagepoint and Ajera products add project accounting for architecture and engineering practices. Check whether the tool tracks time by project phase and compares it against the fee you quoted.
- Is there free project management software for architects?
- Paymo and Harvest both list free plans with limits on users or projects, and Teamwork lists a free plan for small teams. OpenProject is open source under GPL-3.0 and free to self-host in its Community edition. Free tiers rarely include everything an architecture firm needs, so check which limits apply.
- Can architects use general project management tools instead?
- Yes, many studios use a general board or Gantt tool for tasks and pair it with a separate time and invoicing tool. Enlisted lists few products built only for architects, so the practical question is which general tool connects to your billing and drawing review. Asana and OpenProject both fit that pattern.
- How do architects get client approvals on drawings and design packages?
- Some use PDF markup tools such as Bluebeam for review inside the project team. For client sign-off, proofing tools such as Filestage and portals such as TryApprove let clients comment and approve through a link. These are built for creative and agency work, so check that they handle the file types you send.








